STILLWATER, Okla., (The Oklahoma Post) – October 7, 2025
Guest Editorial
By Cindy Whopper, Tik Tok Evangelist
Oklahoma’s judiciary is asking for more; much more.
Under a recent recommendation from the Board on Judicial Compensation, judges could see a 17.58% pay increase beginning next year. That would bring district judges to roughly $197,189, associate district judges to around $181,000, and special judges close to $145,000. The chief justice of the Oklahoma Supreme Court could earn more than $233,000 annually.
On paper, these adjustments would make Oklahoma’s judicial pay more competitive with surrounding states. But the question that never seems to get a clear answer is: competitive for what outcome?
The Numbers Tell a Story, But Not the Whole One
The argument for the raise rests on two claims: that Oklahoma lags behind its peers, and that better pay will attract better judges. Both sound reasonable. Neither has been proven.
It’s true that Oklahoma ranks near the bottom in judicial pay, around 45th nationally. But compensation rankings alone don’t justify a raise of nearly one-fifth. Public officials at every level earn less than their peers in higher-income states.
The Board offers little data to show that increased judicial salaries would improve outcomes. Would case backlogs shrink? Would litigants get faster or fairer hearings? Would fewer cases be reversed on appeal? The record is silent.
Public Money, Public Burden
The proposed increase would cost taxpayers roughly $10 million. That’s not an abstract figure. It represents choices between funding judicial raises or investing in court clerks, public defenders, teachers, or social workers who face equally heavy caseloads and far less pay.
Judicial independence is critical. But independence does not mean immunity from accountability. When every other public servant is measured by performance metrics, the judiciary should not be the exception.
The Board on Judicial Compensation meets, deliberates, and recommends raises largely out of public view. Its members are appointed, not elected. There’s no statutory requirement that they publish performance benchmarks, case-flow data, or comparative analysis adjusted for cost of living.
Without transparency, “competitive pay” becomes a convenient slogan, not a standard.
If judicial raises are warranted, they should be earned by measurable public benefit, faster adjudication, fewer procedural errors, improved access to justice. Otherwise, the raise looks less like reform and more like reward.
The Hidden Crisis Beneath the Numbers
Recent data reveals a more complex picture and a genuine warning sign.
Judges aren’t simply asking for more; they are working within a system that is quietly breaking down. Over the past decade, Oklahoma’s judiciary has lost roughly 9% of its purchasing power even after modest raises. A district judge’s current salary of about $167,700 buys less today than it did in 2010, when the inflation-adjusted value was $184,295.
Meanwhile, the number of qualified applicants has collapsed by 78%. from an average of 15 per vacancy in 2015 to just 3.3 today. Three recent judicial openings drew only 10 total applicants statewide.
Experienced private attorneys, particularly those with 15+ years of practice at major firms—routinely earn between $250,000 and $375,000, while newer attorneys begin around $115,000. Even mid-career attorneys with five years of experience earn $145,000-$175,000. The proposed judicial salary of $197,189 falls below what many mid-to-senior-level private practitioners command.
Even with the proposed raise, Oklahoma judges would move only to the regional average, ranking near 25th–30th nationally, not the top tier. The increase is a correction for years of stagnation.
The problem is not that the Board is overreaching; it’s that the public has been underinformed. Without transparency, what looks like self-interest can in fact be institutional decay.
Raising pay may be justified, but only if paired with mandatory accountability, public performance data, cost-of-living analyses, and published metrics on recruitment, caseload, and efficiency.
The Political Context: A Pattern of Partial Funding
The Board on Judicial Compensation has been here before and the Legislature has repeatedly given judges less than recommended.
In 2023, the Board recommended a 17% increase. But during budget negotiations, Governor Kevin Stitt told lawmakers he wouldn’t veto the budget only if they gave district and special judges just 7% and gave appellate judges nothing. Lawmakers agreed. In 2025, the Legislature finally extended the 7% raise to appellate judges.
This pattern goes back further: In 2019, the Board recommended 9%, and lawmakers approved only 4.5%. In 2013, they recommended 12% and got 6%.
The judiciary consistently asks for what experts say is needed and consistently receives roughly half. Meanwhile, the talent crisis deepens.
If the goal were truly to reach regional average compensation, the increase would need to be 23%, not 17.58%. The Board’s current recommendation is already a compromise.
The question Oklahoma faces isn’t whether judges deserve more money. It’s whether the state can afford to keep operating a justice system that fewer qualified attorneys want to join. When only three people apply for a judgeship that once drew fifteen candidates, the system isn’t selective anymore; it’s desperate.
If compensation continues to lag and applicant pools continue to shrink, Oklahoma won’t be choosing the best judges. It will be taking whoever is willing.
That’s a recruitment crisis dressed up as fiscal responsibility.
A Simple Proposition
Accountability should not end at the courthouse steps. Before Oklahoma commits millions in taxpayer funds, the judiciary should demonstrate, not just declare the need.
If judges can prove that higher pay correlates with better justice, most Oklahomans would stand behind them. But until that proof exists, there’s no reason the public should pay more for the same performance.
SOURCES
Board on Judicial Compensation Recommendation:
- Oklahoma Voice, “Board recommends 17.58% pay hike for Oklahoma judges,” Barbara Hoberock, September 19, 2025. https://oklahomavoice.com/2025/09/19/board-recommends-17-58-pay-hike-for-oklahoma-judges/
- Elias & Elias (Quorum Call), “Judicial compensation board recommends 17-plus percent increase for judges, justices,” Shawn Ashley, September 2025. https://eliasandelias.com/judicial-compensation-board-recommends17-plus-percent-increase-for-judges-justices/
- FOX 25 Oklahoma City, “Board on Judicial Compensation recommending 17.58% raise for Oklahoma judges,” September 19, 2025. https://okcfox.com/news/local/board-on-judicial-compensation-recommending-1758-raise-for-oklahoma-judges-oklahoma-state-legislature-oklahoma-supreme-court
Historical Legislative Actions:
- NonDoc, “Board recommends 17% judicial pay raise to Legislature,” Michael McNutt, September 19, 2023. https://nondoc.com/2023/09/19/board-recommends-17-judicial-pay-raise-to-legislature/
- NonDoc, “Amid cuts, debate brews on proposed judicial pay raise,” Lionel Ramos, May 8, 2020. https://nondoc.com/2020/05/08/debate-brews-on-judicial-pay-raise/
National Judicial Salary Rankings:
- National Center for State Courts, “Survey of Judicial Salaries,” July 2025. https://www.ncsc.org/salarytracker
Writing By: Cindy Whopper | Editing by Robbie Robertson
Got evidence, events, birthdays, obits or inside info?
Email The Oklahoma Post confidentially: editor@theokpost.com
And for the record: unlike the courthouse clique, The Oklahoma Post runs on facts, not dark money.
© 2025 The Oklahoma Post |
By The People’s Popular Paper | Oklahoma Special Report
2025 -The Oklahoma Post – TheOKPost.com is dedicated to delivering relevant news and information to Oklahomans, sharing their stories, pictures, and experiences. The content on this website includes contributions from various individuals and links to external public and privately owned sources. The views and opinions expressed in user-generated content are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect The Oklahoma Post. The Oklahoma Post does not independently verify the accuracy of third-party contributions and rely upon contributors to fact-check their work. By sharing links and allowing open contributions, TheOKPost.com exercises the right to free speech and providing a platform for diverse perspectives.
