False Police Report, Fabricated Evidence, Corporate Collusion, and No Accountability: Why Sheriff Corey Rink Must Be Decertified by CLEET and Removed from Public Trust

OKLAHOMA CITY, Okla., (The Oklahoma Post) – September 5th, 2025

The integrity of law enforcement in Oklahoma has been deeply compromised by the conduct of Sheriff Corey Rink of Garfield County. In collaboration with Koch Industries and its employee Shon Jackson, Rink’s office produced and maintained a false police report (CFS 22-0742) targeting Gregory Moyer. Despite conclusive evidence disproving the allegations, the report remains in the system, and no apology or corrective action has been taken.

Before examining the misconduct itself, it is important to look at who stands behind a bad law enforcement officer, the officials and council members tasked with oversight, yet responsible for keeping him certified. Seen these names before y’all.

Who Runs CLEET and Who Is Responsible for Oversight

The Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training (CLEET) is governed by a Council of appointed members and managed by executive staff. These individuals, named on Oklahoma’s official government websites, are directly responsible for law enforcement certification and decertification in this state. When false reports and corporate collusion remain unaddressed, the accountability trail leads here.

CLEET Governing Council (Publicly Listed Members)

• Director Donnie Anderson – Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control (Chairman)
• Chief Don Sweger – Guthrie Police Department (Vice-Chairman)
• Chief Don Cluck – Tuttle Police Department
• Sheriff Jim Mullett – Garvin County Sheriff’s Office
• Lieutenant Elijah Hass – McAlester Police Department
• Director Greg Mashburn – Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation (OSBI)
• Executive Director Holli Witherington – Brandon Whitten Institute for Addiction & Recovery
• Commissioner Tim Tipton – Department of Public Safety
• Deputy Sheriff Todd Young – Pontotoc County Sheriff’s Office
• Chief Lance Arnold – Broken Arrow Police Department
• Chief Jeremy McGill – Iowa Tribe Police Department
• Director Thomas Comstock – GRAND Mental Health, Tulsa (Here One Of His Employees In Fear Of Her POLICE HUSBAND here)
• Sheriff Andy Cumberledge – Love County Sheriff’s Office

CLEET Executive Staff (Administration)

• Executive Director – Darry Stacy
• General Counsel / Interim Director – Preston Draper
• Chief of Operations – Todd Bussell
• Chief of Staff – Janey Rowden
• Public Information Manager – Andrew Hill

Why This Matters

These officials control the certification, suspension, and decertification of every law enforcement officer in Oklahoma. Under OAC § 390:10-1-7 and 70 O.S. § 3311, CLEET has both the authority and duty to revoke certifications when dishonesty, falsification, or conduct unbecoming an officer is documented. When they fail to act, they are not just administrators; they become enablers of corruption, allowing dishonest officers like Sheriff Corey Rink to remain certified and armed with the credibility of the State.

In Moyer’s Case (and others) The Evidence is Overwhelming:

• The police report places Moyer in Enid, OK at 2:45 a.m. on Oct. 22, 2022, yet hotel, casino, and travel receipts prove he was in Iowa at that time.
• The report relied on a vehicle tag (“TWSTER”) that does not exist in Oklahoma’s DMV records. See video below.
• The District Attorney (Mike Fields) later admitted the evidence was mistaken identification, the video did not show Moyer, and no charges were filed.
• Nevertheless, Rink’s office logged this into official records, trespassed Moyer from Koch property without verification, and allowed harassment to continue.
• This report was “deactivated by a supervisor”, further proof it was never legitimate.
• Yet the false BOLO and report remain open to the public, causing ongoing reputational harm.

This is a textbook case of fabrication of evidence, collusion between corporate security and law enforcement, and abuse of public trust.

Factual Timeline vs. Fabricated Report

Oct. 20, 2022 (Thursday)

• Moyer drives to Oklahoma, receives call from Shon Jackson while in southern Minnesota.
• Checks into Holiday Inn Express in Tulsa late at night.

Oct. 21, 2022 (Friday)

• Attends 10:00 a.m. hearing in Stillwater (Moyer v. City of Stillwater FOIA case); witness Darrell Dougherty present.
• Leaves Stillwater after noon, drives north.
• That night: Checks into Holiday Inn Express in Northwood, Iowa; visited Diamond Jo Worth Casino.

Oct. 22, 2022 (Saturday)

• 10:12 a.m.: Places sports parlay bet at Diamond Jo Casino (timestamped).
• Afternoon: Back in Minnesota; picks up dogs in Hackensack, around 3:00–3:30 p.m.

Oct. 23, 2022 (Sunday)

• At home in Minnesota.
• Shon Jackson calls Garfield County Sheriff’s Office → Sheriff Rink → Deputy Kristi Ream.
• Ream writes CFS 22-0742, falsely claiming Moyer was at Koch Fertilizer, Enid, at 2:45 a.m. on Oct. 22.

Deputy Ream’s Phone Call: Evidence of Improper Conduct
On October 31, 2022, Deputy Kristi Ream of the Garfield County Sheriff’s Office called Gregory Moyer by phone, identifying herself by badge number (507) and stating that she was “trespassing” him from Koch Nitrogen property in Enid. In the recorded call, Ream admitted the action was initiated by Koch Industries and claimed, without verification, that “we have you on video,” even as she conceded there were no threats and that Moyer resided in Minnesota. Despite being told that he had not lived or worked in Oklahoma for years, she repeated that if he returned he would be arrested, calling it a “trespass order.” When pressed, Ream could not identify who at Koch had made the complaint, and directed Moyer to travel to Oklahoma in person to request the report. The call demonstrates a misuse of law-enforcement authority: acting at the behest of a private corporation, issuing legal threats across state lines without court order, and invoking unverified “video” evidence that the District Attorney later admitted did not establish Moyer’s presence. This phone call, combined with the falsified report CFS 22-0742, illustrates dishonesty, abuse of authority, and collusion with corporate interests—grounds for mandatory CLEET decertification.

The False Report (CFS 22-0742)

Allegations:

• Moyer was trespassing at Koch Fertilizer, Enid, OK.
• Driving a white Hyundai with plate TWSTER.
• Acting erratic, making “odd comments,” seeking St. Mary’s Hospital.

Problems:

• No video evidence provided (report merely references Koch video). The Koch Video ended up being a fraud on court.
• No vehicle verification performed.
• “TWSTER” plate confirmed nonexistent by Service Oklahoma (Feb. 8, 2023).
• Deputy Ream wrote report solely on Jackson’s word.

District Attorney’s Findings (Mike Fields, Jan. 15, 2023)

• Confirms Koch issued a Security Alert (BOLO) in May 2022 targeting Moyer.
• Acknowledges a conversation between Jackson and Moyer on Oct. 20, 2022, but nothing criminal.
• States gate attendant on Oct. 22, 2022 mistakenly identified Moyer as driver of a suspicious vehicle.
• DA reviewed video: “It cannot be determined who was driving.”
• Acknowledges Moyer’s hotel and casino receipts prove he was out-of-state.
• Concludes: “No reason to initiate criminal proceedings.”

Service Oklahoma Records (Feb. 8, 2023)

• Plate TWSTER: No record found in Oklahoma DMV system.
• Confirms the supposed vehicle tag used to identify Moyer was fabricated or falsified.

The transcript shows Deputy Ream threatening arrest across state lines, invoking nonexistent legal authority (“trespass order”), and citing “video” evidence later disproven by the DA. The report codified these same falsehoods into the record, while the DA’s letter confirms mistaken identity and no basis for prosecution. Together, these documents prove dishonesty, misuse of authority, and corporate collusion, all disqualifying under CLEET Rule 390:25-1-19 (falsification of reports, conduct unbecoming, failure to investigate).

Open Records Requests (Feb. 13, 2023)

Filed by Moyer to Sheriff Rink, demanding:

• All communications between Garfield County SO and Koch Industries.
• Records of plate TWSTER.
• Video/photo evidence cited in report.
• Donor/organizational connections between Rink’s office and Koch.
• Surveillance or coordination with private security.

No responsive records provided to date.

Improper Role of Collins, Zorn & Wagner (CZW)
Adding to the impropriety, the law firm Collins, Zorn & Wagner (CZW) entered appearances to represent Sheriff Corey Rink, Garfield County, and Payne County in related matters, even as the same firm positioned itself to handle open records requests tied directly to those clients. You see, that day in Stillwater, Moyer was arguing against, and winning against CZW Law’s attorneys in Payne County Court. This dual role is a glaring conflict of interest: CZW was simultaneously defending the very actors accused of collusion while controlling access to the documents that could expose that collusion. By filtering FOIA/ORA compliance through defense counsel aligned with Koch-connected officials, the process was corrupted at its core. Instead of neutral disclosure, the public was forced to accept the word of a firm that had every incentive to withhold, delay, or shape production in favor of its clients. This structural conflict undermines both the Oklahoma Open Records Act’s guarantee of transparency and the constitutional right of citizens to access records free from manipulation by parties under investigation.

Ignored Complaint by Drummond

Despite unequivocal evidence of fabrication and misconduct, Attorney General Gentner Drummond’s office failed to act on the complaint regarding Sheriff Corey Rink and Garfield County officials. The complaint laid bare a false police report, a bogus BOLO, and continuing damage to Gregory Moyer’s reputation—but no investigation, apology, or corrective action was ever initiated. Drummond’s silence and inaction allowed falsehoods to remain unaddressed and unchecked by law enforcement leadership.

Ethics Complaint Triggered by Conflicts of Interest

Further troubling developments emerged when federal witness Darrell Dougherty indicated that Attorney General Drummond may have personal or professional ties to individuals involved in the misconduct that called for investigation. This potential conflict compromised the impartiality of the oversight process. As a result, it became imperative to file a formal ethics complaint to ensure accountability and preserve public trust in state leadership.

Disappeared Endorsement of Mike Fields

Adding to concerns about transparency is the curious disappearance of an article praising Mike Fields as a strong candidate for lieutenant governor. This article reportedly appeared on the day Fields resigned—but it has since vanished from the internet. What is verifiable is that DA Fields officially left office on January 1, 2024 (Ballotpedia, Yukon Progress News). The timing raises questions about whether the article, once public, was deliberately erased—potentially to obscure political alliances linked to the misconduct at issue.

Accountability Evaded by Fields, Drummond, and CZW

The legal filings of former DA Mike Fields and Attorney General Gentner Drummond show a consistent theme: avoiding responsibility rather than addressing the false police report at the center of this case. Fields argued that even if the report was fabricated, his refusal to investigate or correct it could not give rise to liability because prosecutors are “immune.” Drummond insisted the court lacked jurisdiction over him entirely, focusing on procedural defenses while ignoring the substance. At the same time, Collins, Zorn & Wagner represented county sheriffs while filtering Open Records Act requests—an arrangement that gave defense counsel control over access to the very documents that could expose misconduct. This posture violates both the spirit and letter of the law. Under 42 U.S.C. §1983, state actors may not deprive citizens of constitutional rights under color of law. Under the Oklahoma Open Records Act (51 O.S. §24A.5), records must be produced promptly and without obstruction. By shielding each other, claiming immunity, and stonewalling transparency, these defendants broke trust with the public. Worse, they have yet to take any corrective action: the false BOLO and report remain public, no apology has been issued, and no disciplinary measures have been taken. The law demands accountability; instead, what Oklahomans see is a system of self-protection that allows misconduct to persist unchecked.

Contradiction Chart

The Ironic FOIA Hearing

Perhaps the deepest irony is that these retaliatory actions occurred while Gregory Moyer was engaged in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) hearing: Moyer v. City of Stillwater. During that process, intended to promote transparency and accountability, Moyer was subjected instead to a campaign of harassment: false police reports, BOLO alerts, and abusive emails. It is chilling that the very system designed to uphold openness and citizen rights was used against him to suppress them.

Sheriff Corey Rink’s continued certification by CLEET represents a clear danger to public trust. A law enforcement officer who allows his badge to be used for false reports, fabricated tags, and corporate harassment cannot be trusted to enforce the law fairly.

The evidence : hotel and travel receipts, casino timestamps, DA’s letter, Service Oklahoma’s confirmation, and the Garfield County report itself proves beyond dispute that this report was false from the start.

For the integrity of Oklahoma law enforcement, Corey Rink must be decertified by CLEET and removed from any role of public trust.

A Pattern of Horrific Crimes Under Rink’s Tenure

During Sheriff Corey Rink’s tenure, Garfield County has faced a string of brutal, high-profile crimes that raise hard questions about prevention, coordination, and public safety. In August 2025, a gunman opened fire at Integris Bass Baptist in Enid, killing 72-year-old hospital security officer J.W. Bode; KOCO’s review of court records shows the suspect, Dedrick Bloss, had a decades-long criminal history and multiple prior protective orders before he was killed by police at the scene. KOCO Earlier, in April 2022, a man released from DOC custody just weeks prior was arrested for the rape and murder of a two-year-old at an Enid motel—an attack News 9 reported occurred after his March 2022 release despite recent institutional misconduct findings while incarcerated. News 9 Meanwhile, cases tied to abuse of vulnerable Oklahomans at Enid’s Robert M. Greer Center have faltered: prosecutors dropped charges against multiple former staffers in 2024 after stating a “necessary witness” could not be located, despite months of investigation into alleged stranglings and beatings; separate civil litigation has described fatal mistreatment at the facility.

None of these events can be pinned on a single decision, but together they underscore systemic failures in threat assessment, inter-agency follow-through, and witness protection. Oklahoma officials have long warned that prison-based gangs including the Irish Mob drive violence inside and outside custody; federal and state investigations have secured convictions against Irish Mob members for racketeering, maiming, and murders in recent years. In that context, community safety in Garfield County demanded proactive, coordinated strategies—not fabricated reports and a bogus BOLO against a private citizen. The public deserves a sheriff’s office focused on real threats, effective witness work, and transparent case handling, not one that diverts resources into discredited narratives while preventable violence proliferates.

Why Sheriff Corey Rink Must Be Decertified (CLEET Standards)

OAC 390:25-1-19 – Grounds for Revocation

• Dishonesty or falsification of reports → Proven by CFS 22-0742.
• Conduct unbecoming of an officer → Collusion with private corporations to harass a litigant.
• Failure to properly investigate → No verification of video, vehicle, or witness credibility.
• Misuse of authority → “Trespass order” issued based on false report.

70 O.S. § 3311(J) – Disciplinary Standards

• Provides CLEET authority to investigate and revoke certification for misconduct, including “falsification of any official report, record of evidence, or in testimony under oath” (§ 3311(J)(1)(d)).
• Requires hearings under the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act before revocation or suspension, ensuring due process while mandating accountability.

Supervisory Accountability

• As Sheriff, Rink signed correspondence acknowledging this report.
• Under § 3311(J), command officers share responsibility when subordinates falsify or misuse official reports.

Brady/Giglio Standards

• The U.S. Supreme Court requires disclosure of both exculpatory (Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963)) and impeachment (Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972)) evidence.
• Documented dishonesty in official reports makes Sheriff Rink unfit to serve as a credible witness. Prosecutors would be required to disclose his credibility issues in every case, undermining future prosecutions.

Legal Authority for CLEET Decertification

The authority to decertify Sheriff Corey Rink is clear under both federal and state law.

Federal Standards
The U.S. Supreme Court has long held that dishonesty by law enforcement officers undermines due process. In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the Court required prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense. In Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), that duty was extended to include impeachment evidence, specifically requiring disclosure of law enforcement officers’ credibility issues. An officer documented to have filed or maintained a false report is therefore compromised as a witness. Sheriff Rink’s conduct in CFS 22-0742 not only damages public trust but also impairs the State’s ability to prosecute criminal cases, because his credibility would have to be disclosed in every future proceeding.

State Authority
Oklahoma law provides CLEET with both the authority and procedures to revoke an officer’s certification:

• OAC 390:10-1-7 – Authorizes withdrawal, suspension, or revocation of peace-officer certification.
• OAC 390:25-1-19 – Provides grounds for revocation and specifies that advanced certifications must be revoked when the basic certification is revoked.
• 70 O.S. § 3311(J)(1)(d) – Directs that certification may be revoked for falsification of reports, records of evidence, or testimony under oath.
• 70 O.S. § 3311(H)(1) – Requires law-enforcement agencies to report officer resignations or terminations to CLEET within ten days.
• 70 O.S. § 3311.4 – Requires ongoing training and allows suspension of certification for noncompliance, with procedures governed by the Oklahoma Administrative Procedures Act.

Taken together, these authorities give CLEET a clear mandate and procedural framework to revoke Sheriff Rink’s certification. His continued status as a certified officer, despite documented dishonesty, violates the Brady/Giglio disclosure obligations and places every future prosecution in Garfield County at risk of reversal.

For the integrity of Oklahoma’s criminal justice system, CLEET must act without delay.

Call to Action

To CLEET:

• Open decertification proceedings on Corey Rink under OAC § 390:10-1-7 and Rule 390:25-1-12 for falsification/dishonesty, misconduct, and failure to properly investigate.
• Place Rink on the Brady/Giglio disclosure list immediately, and notify all DA offices that his credibility is impaired for impeachment purposes.
• Suspend Rink’s certification pending outcome of the decertification hearing, pursuant to 70 O.S. § 3311.4 (APA procedures for suspension).
• Order a corrective notice to all Oklahoma agencies that the CFS 22-0742 report was invalidated (deactivated) and direct the removal or notation of the false report and BOLO from any public or interagency database.
• Require Garfield County to file a compliance affidavit within 10 days confirming (a) removal/notation of the false report and BOLO, and (b) Brady/Giglio disclosure has been made in all cases touching Rink.
• Audit Garfield County’s reporting compliance under 70 O.S. § 3311(H)(1) (agency duty to report officer separations/discipline to CLEET) and warn of sanctions if any required reports were withheld or delayed.
• Issue agency-wide guidance prohibiting “corporate-initiated trespass orders” without verification and requiring independent evidence (not just private complainant say-so) before any report that could affect a citizen’s liberty or reputation.
• Open a standards review to adopt a mandatory revocation cascade (OAC § 390:25-1-19) so that any advanced certifications immediately fall when a basic certification is revoked.
• Publish the outcome and rationale of this proceeding on CLEET’s website—creating a transparent precedent that falsified reports and Brady/Giglio violations will result in swift decertification.

To Oklahoma State Legislators:

• Open an oversight inquiry into collusion between Garfield County law enforcement, Koch Industries, and outside counsel (CZW), with public hearings.
• Require mandatory correction/removal of disproven BOLOs and reports once a DA repudiates or declines prosecution, so false records don’t linger in public systems.
• Pass legislation requiring corporate-initiated complaints to be independently verified before being entered into official law-enforcement reports.
• Mandate statewide Brady/Giglio reporting with a public database of officers who have been found dishonest or whose testimony is impaired.
• Impose penalties on counties and agencies that fail to comply with 70 O.S. § 3311(H)(1) reporting obligations (such as suspending state funds).
• Establish clear conflict-of-interest rules forbidding the same law firm from defending county officials while simultaneously handling open-records requests tied to those same officials.
• Fund and empower an independent Inspector General to review misconduct complaints against law enforcement that local DAs or the AG decline to pursue.
• Amend the Oklahoma Open Records Act to guarantee that ORA/FOIA compliance cannot be filtered through defense counsel for the very parties under investigation.
• Hold public accountability hearings with CLEET leadership to ensure decertification standards are enforced consistently, and that citizens can see who is being disciplined and why.

To the Public:

• Recognize this is not an isolated error, but a structural failure.
• Demand accountability from YOUR County and CLEET.
• Support reforms to stop privatized policing and protect citizen rights.

There is no statute of limitations on accountability when it comes to dishonesty and misconduct by public officials. Unlike private civil disputes that may expire after a set period, the consequences of falsifying official reports or abusing authority are continuous: every day the false record remains active in government databases, every time it is relied upon in decision-making or used to impeach credibility, the violation is renewed. Courts have recognized this principle through the continuing-violation doctrine, which tolls limitations when unlawful conduct produces ongoing harm. At the federal level, the Supreme Court in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), underscored that constitutional injuries tied to invalid or falsified records cannot be insulated by mere passage of time so long as the record itself continues to affect rights. At the state level, 70 O.S. § 3311(J) expressly empowers CLEET to revoke certification for falsification of reports or testimony, without any temporal restriction. Together, these authorities confirm that misconduct like CFS 22-0742 is not a “stale” issue, it remains a live violation until corrected.

The Myth of Koch’s Video

Central to the fabricated report was Koch Industries’ claim that surveillance video showed Gregory Moyer trespassing at its Enid facility. Yet when the footage was reviewed by the District Attorney, it proved useless: the recording was grainy, inconclusive, and could not identify who was driving. Despite this, Deputy Ream cited the video as proof in her report, and Sheriff Rink’s office allowed that claim to stand uncorrected. In reality, the so-called “evidence” functioned as little more than a corporate bluff—invoked to give legitimacy to a false narrative that had no basis in fact. The reliance on such a fake video demonstrates not only dishonesty but reckless disregard for the truth by both Koch and Garfield County law enforcement.

Contradictory Claims by Mike Fields
In his legal filings, former District Attorney Mike Fields referenced an “argument” between Gregory Moyer and Koch employee Shon Jackson as part of the narrative supporting the trespass report. Yet the recorded audio of that conversation tells a very different story. The tape contains no threats, no hostile behavior, and no evidence of any argument at all. Instead, it shows a routine, civil exchange stripped of the insinuations used in Fields’ defense. This contradiction underscores a larger pattern: state officials leaning on unverified corporate accounts to justify false reports, while disregarding hard evidence that disproves them.

Shon Jackson’s unexpected phone call to Moyer on the day he was traveling out of Minnesota to Oklahoma.

Prepared for submission to CLEET, Oklahoma State Representatives, and for public distribution. All facts drawn from official Garfield County Sheriff records, Service Oklahoma DMV correspondence, DA Mike Fields’ January 15, 2023 letter, and state statutes.

In 2026, let’s vote for the future—not the headlines.

Writing By: Rhonda Fields | Editing by Robbie Robertson

Got evidence, events, birthdays, obits or inside info?
Email The Oklahoma Post confidentially: editor@theokpost.com

And for the record: unlike the courthouse clique, The Oklahoma Post runs on facts, not dark money.

© 2025 The Oklahoma Post |

By The People’s Popular Paper | Oklahoma Special Report

2025 -The Oklahoma Post – TheOKPost.com is dedicated to delivering relevant news and information to Oklahomans, sharing their stories, pictures, and experiences. The content on this website includes contributions from various individuals and links to external public and privately owned sources. The views and opinions expressed in user-generated content are solely those of the respective authors and do not necessarily reflect The Oklahoma Post. The Oklahoma Post does not independently verify the accuracy of third-party contributions and rely upon contributors to fact-check their work. By sharing links and allowing open contributions, TheOKPost.com exercises the right to free speech and providing a platform for diverse perspectives.